Seriously, for the unitiated: teabagging.
Definiton #3 and #4 were what came to my mind. In the future, #6 will as well.
I posted a short comment on Facebook:
I love all these folks “teabagging”. Protesting taxation without representation? Uh. No. Protesting high taxes? Uh, no. Lowest taxes in ages.
Someone I respect commented that these events are about wasteful and irresponsible spending. My father echoed a similar comment when I talked with him the other day.
This is where it gets confusing. Me, personally? I’m a libertarian who thinks wasteful government spending is bad. Although I’m also a bit pragmatic and think that the minimal amount of government should be spent on things like protecting our civil liberties and preserving life (including healthcare). That stated, I hate politics… I hate the hypocrisy.
These “teabagging” events are political rallies. They are staged by the Republicans as an attempt to shock some life back into a party which has betrayed its roots and become the party of big spending, corporate socialism, imperialism, and fascism. So, it is with great distrust and even anger that I approach folks like Dick Armey and Glenn Beck railing about the tax and spend Obama administration.
Disclosure, yes, I did vote for Obama. I voted for Obama because I could not ethically accept another 4 years of the same old Republican administration. The only chance I had for change is if the people of the United States punished the Republican Party for its failings.
But what about Ron Paul? He ran as a Republican? Sure he did. He ran an amazing campaign despite the fact that the Republican Party and Fox News network were suppressing his speech and tearing him apart as a lunatic when he preached against bailouts, expensive wars without purpose, and irresponsible spending. Now all these same parties seem to have found the light - now that a neocon isn’t in office. Hypocrites…
So, about these teabagging events… watching the local news, it doesn’t appear that a lot of the people they are interviewing care about big government or big spending at all. Certainly they can’t be following in the ideological footsteps of the original “Tea party” which was specifically protesting taxation without representation.
The signs: “Born free but taxed to death”, “Taxed to Death”, “T.E.A. Taxed Enough Already”… they interviewed this middle-aged woman wearing a hat adorned with tea bags hanging on strings: “The government is taking all our money” (speak it in your most stereotypical southern drawl). Sure, quite a few had signs about government spending, but these events seem to cater to the lowest common denominator, and the basest elements of an obviously ignorant populous (since taxes already are low and the latest moves have been to continue to lower taxes for the bulk of Americans).
I am TOTALLY against the bailouts. But the first bailout was initiated by George Bush. Again, these same people weren’t complaining then. They didn’t seem to mind when the candidate they supported spent money like it was going out of style (i.e. irresponsibly) for eight years. So why now?